Home > Politics > Our children’s children will still be paying

Our children’s children will still be paying

We authorized $700B to be used to help take care of bad mortgages.  The government gave money to banks.  Some banks didn’t want the money and were coerced into taking it.  In fact, an acquaintance at Chase stated that the $25B that they received was set aside.  Chase didn’t need the money and is just going to hold on to it.  Now we have Obama and his minions looking to put a $1 trillion stimulus in play.  The stimulus package is nothing more than a way to get a large chunk of the private sector sucking on the government tit.  A large chunk of the money are actually earmarks.  Why do we need the government spending this money?  Instead of taking money (that we don’t have) and doling it out like dope dealer to an addict, why can’t the government cut our taxes and let us spend the extra money that we have where we see fit?  This would have a direct, speedy impact on families and the economy.  I’ll tell you why.  Because the current government wants to rule your life and tell you what you can and can’t do.  These tax cuts should be across the board.  Not mainly for people who don’t pay taxes anyway.  Tax burden of $0 – $1000 tax cut = $1000 refund check.  But the refund check is someone else’s money.  This is Obama’s redistribution of wealth that he so smugly talked of with Joe the plumber, but it’s in disguise, buried in the tax code. 

First it’s the nationalization of banks.  Next comes national (universal) health care.  Once these two things are in place, we are done.  We will have become just like a western European social democracy (emphasis on social).  If I wanted to live in the UK or France, I’d move there.

Check out this link.  The first half pertains to this blog, but the whole thing is worth watching.  http://www.foxnews.com/video/index.html?playerId=videolandingpage&streamingFormat=FLASH&referralObject=3459409&referralPlaylistId=search|morris

I would urge each and every one of you to call you Senators and Congressmen.  Tell them to not support the $1 trillion stimulus package that is making its way through Congress.  We can not afford it!  Where will the money come from?  More importantly, where will it go?  This stimulus package is a huge piece of pork.  History has proven that we cannot spend our way out of a recession.  Please write emails, make phone calls, send faxes.  Tell your Senators to filibuster this piece of garbage. 

Read this article.  http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0109/17862.html

The Democrats are drunk with power.  They are making statements that show they don’t care what anyone else thinks.  We, the people, need to tell them to quit spending OUR MONEY!!!  Especially when they don’t even have it to spend.

  1. Tamsen
    January 30th, 2009 at 11:34 | #1

    I am turning into an Independent more and more, but don’t think all Democrats are for this. I do think the Wrong ones, however, are. And bailing out failed industries- someone will fill up the gaps, let them Fall.

  2. sunnysongbird
    January 27th, 2009 at 00:19 | #2

    @azcarnivore
    There never has been a socialistic state in the first place. I don’t deny that communism didn’t work in Russia, but it sure seems to be working for our new economic rival and the people lending us all our money (meaning China). People in China make $800-$1000 annually and still retire with thousands in savings. Kind of amazing to think about that.

    But that wasn’t my point. My point is that several Republicans have openly advocated obstructionism, some even going so far as to brazenly point out that it’s because of their partisan beliefs (John McCain specifically mentioning that the stimulus bill (which he’s opposing) was written by Democrats, anyone?)

    Five years ago, that kind of talk was considered EXTREMELY bad-form, treasonous, and even sometimes (wrongfully) illegal (see the story about the “Grannies for Peace” getting arrested and sent to jail in protest of the war in Iraq).

    I’m just curious how this double-talk is propagated successfully. Though I guess with a dominantly Democratic government voted in now, it wasn’t so successful after all…

  3. January 26th, 2009 at 06:59 | #3

    The comment was that he wants him to fail if being successful means socialism. Socialism is failure. Look around the world and show me a successful socialistic state.

  4. sunnysongbird
    January 26th, 2009 at 02:10 | #4

    So….

    What did the Democrats do when the Republicans were in the majority in Congress for the first 6 years of Bush’s reign?

    That’s right, they rolled over and let all those horrible, horrible laws like No Child Left Behind and the Clean Air Act pass in the name of “bipartisanship.”

    Fact of the matter is, the progressive liberals are at the helm now.

    And we’re being so much nicer than these past 8 years have seen the majority.

    Remember when all those conservatives were talking about not supporting the wars was treason? Speaking out against President Bush was morally reprehensible and everybody should be ok with warrantless wiretapping because you shouldn’t have anything to hide anyway, right?!?!?

    Where’s all that “speaking out against the government is treason” stuff now? Oh, that’s right. Mr. Limbaugh (with over 20 million listeners, he gets to be the face of conservatism in this instance) is flat-out saying, “I want President Obama to fail.”

    Sad, ain’t it?

  1. No trackbacks yet.
You must be logged in to post a comment.